America
US court backs Trump in withholding grants from 'sanctuary cities'
San Francisco, July 13
A US appeals court has supported President Donald Trump's administration in giving funding priorities to cities that are willing to cooperate with federal agencies in dealing with undocumented immigrants.
On Friday, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals here ruled in a 2-1 decision that the Department of Justice (DOJ) was justified to cut back Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grants from sanctuary cities and states that refused to allow local police to work with federal law-enforcement agencies in rounding up undocumented immigrants, reports Xinhua news agency.
The court decision came two days before reported upcoming federal sweeps on illegal immigrants in 10 US cities, which are expected to begin on Sunday.
"The panel held that DOJ did not exceed its statutory authority in awarding bonus points to applicants that selected the illegal immigration focus area," Judge Sandra Ikuta said in the ruling.
A panel of the court's judges rejected a lawsuit by Los Angles for what it claimed failing to get $3 million grants from the DOJ because the city did not list crackdown on undocumented immigrants as a priority area.
The grants were created by Congress in 1994 to let state or local law enforcement get federal assistance in hiring more police officers and improving police-community interaction. The DOJ was authorized to decide how to spend the federal funds.
In 2017, the DOJ decided to give preferential treatment to cities that are ready to prioritize the issue of illegal immigrants.
Los Angles did not heed the guidelines and lost the grants. The Southern Californian city then brought a lawsuit against the DOJ over the funds denial.
"Cooperation relating to enforcement of federal immigration law is in pursuit of the general welfare, and meets the low bar of being germane to the federal interest in providing the funding to address crime and disorder problems," said the court.
Because the Department's scoring factors encourage, but do not coerce, an applicant to cooperate on immigration matters, the court said, "we also reject Los Angeles's claims that DOJ's use of the factors infringes on state autonomy in a manner that raises Tenth Amendment concerns".
Friday's ruling was viewed as a victory for the Trump government in battles against sanctuary states or cities, which often brushed aside Trump's call for being tougher with undocumented immigrants.
On Friday, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals here ruled in a 2-1 decision that the Department of Justice (DOJ) was justified to cut back Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grants from sanctuary cities and states that refused to allow local police to work with federal law-enforcement agencies in rounding up undocumented immigrants, reports Xinhua news agency.
The court decision came two days before reported upcoming federal sweeps on illegal immigrants in 10 US cities, which are expected to begin on Sunday.
"The panel held that DOJ did not exceed its statutory authority in awarding bonus points to applicants that selected the illegal immigration focus area," Judge Sandra Ikuta said in the ruling.
A panel of the court's judges rejected a lawsuit by Los Angles for what it claimed failing to get $3 million grants from the DOJ because the city did not list crackdown on undocumented immigrants as a priority area.
The grants were created by Congress in 1994 to let state or local law enforcement get federal assistance in hiring more police officers and improving police-community interaction. The DOJ was authorized to decide how to spend the federal funds.
In 2017, the DOJ decided to give preferential treatment to cities that are ready to prioritize the issue of illegal immigrants.
Los Angles did not heed the guidelines and lost the grants. The Southern Californian city then brought a lawsuit against the DOJ over the funds denial.
"Cooperation relating to enforcement of federal immigration law is in pursuit of the general welfare, and meets the low bar of being germane to the federal interest in providing the funding to address crime and disorder problems," said the court.
Because the Department's scoring factors encourage, but do not coerce, an applicant to cooperate on immigration matters, the court said, "we also reject Los Angeles's claims that DOJ's use of the factors infringes on state autonomy in a manner that raises Tenth Amendment concerns".
Friday's ruling was viewed as a victory for the Trump government in battles against sanctuary states or cities, which often brushed aside Trump's call for being tougher with undocumented immigrants.
1 minute ago
Despite my cooperation, Bikaner House removed all 70 photographs without explanation: Raihan Vadra
7 minutes ago
Mysuru Dasara: Stir over Dalit ministers being stopped from performing puja by senior cop
8 minutes ago
Maharashtra ethanol industry faces crisis over Centre's procurement curbs
9 minutes ago
Woman dies after being set ablaze by stepson in J&K’s Udhampur
10 minutes ago
Kerala ex-Minister Veena George’s case takes a turn for the worse
12 minutes ago
Kerala to frame new Labour Code rules after consultations with trade unions
13 minutes ago
'Why is govt so scared': Cong criticises BJP over removal of Raihan Vadra’s Delhi protest photos from exhibition
14 minutes ago
Sonia Gandhi makes Instagram debut, shares first look of her memoir 'Belonging'
16 minutes ago
Karnataka BJP questions Dasara lighting extension, urges CM Shivakumar to ensure daily 3-phase power supply to farmers
17 minutes ago
Gujarat's Dwarka to get Rs 92.70-crore Krishna museum with nine galleries, digital experiences
18 minutes ago
One killed, 100 injured in traditional stick fight in Andhra's Kurnool
18 minutes ago
Guj police bust interstate drug network, seize narcotics worth Rs 25.5 crore, three held
19 minutes ago
Ashok Gehlot condemns removal of over 70 photographs from Raihan Vadra’s exhibition at Bikaner House
