Earlier this week the Seattle City Council passed a resolution, introduced by Councilmember Kshama Sawant, condemning India’s recently passed Citizenship Amendment Act, legislation which provides amnesty and a faster track to citizenship for persecuted religious minorities who fled to India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, or Pakistan.
Despite vigorous public testimony from the local Hindu American community opposed to the resolution, the resolution received 5 yes votes and 4 abstentions.
In response to the actions of the Seattle City Council, HAF board member and co-founder Mihir Meghani, who met with local community leaders prior to the hearing, commented:
“India’s Citizenship Amendment Bill offers much needed relief and a shortened pathway to citizenship for thousands of refugees fleeing unquestionable, well-documented, and continuing religious persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. We’re profoundly disappointed that in passing this resolution the Seattle City Council chose to ignore the plight of these Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Sikhs, and Zoroastrians who have been forced to flee their home countries due to institutionalized discrimination and rising religious bigotry and seek refuge in the secular nation of India.”
HAF California Advocacy Director Easan Katir, who also attended the hearing, noted:
“Much of the testimony I witnessed in favor of Councilmember Sawant’s resolution repeated blatant falsehoods about both the intent and potential effects of the CAA. Kshama Sawant herself publicly peddled fear mongering misinformation, alleging that the entirety of India’s Muslim population could have their citizenship stripped from them. This absurdity couldn’t be farther from the truth. The CAA has absolutely no impact on Indian citizens.”
Local Seattle grassroots organizer Atul Hirpara told HAF:
“When our community learned about Seattle’s proposed resolution, many started to reach out to us, as we had rallied in Seattle’s in December 2019, and wanted to join us at the council to speak against the resolution. Thousands of phone calls and emails were made, with people wanting to take charge of defining our voice, making content and visual material, hundreds of small and big meetings, all aimed at educating the City Council on the facts on why CAA is needed.
The day of hearing began at 4am for a large set of people who reached the city as early as we all could. We had a tremendous solidarity, being joined by people of South Asian descent, as well other community members who believed in the cause. Over 500 members of community that opposed the resolution showed up and did their part. It was beautiful to see how the community came together. We will do it all over again as it showed the true spirit of liberty and cross community mobilization for a democratic cause.”
