Headlines
Salman case: Trial court erred, says HC
Mumbai, Dec 17
The appreciation of evidence by the trial court (sessions court) in the accident case involving Bollywood actor Salman Khan "has not been proper", the Bombay High Court, which acquitted the actor last Thursday, said in its detailed judgment.
"Lastly, in the considered view of this court, the appreciation of the evidence as as done by the trial court in the present matter is not proper and legal as per the settled principles of criminal jurisprudence," Justice A.R. Joshi said in the final judgement running into 305 pages, released and uploaded on the high court website one week after the judgement, and three days before he retires.
"As such, consequently, it must be said that this is not a case in which the prosecution has successfully established its case for all the charges and as such resultantly, the appeal is required to be disposed of," he said.
Additional Sessions Judge D. W. Deshpande, who conducted the trial of Salman, found him guilty on all counts, including the stringent charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
The actor was sentenced to five years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25,000 or an additional six months in jail, which he challenged before the Bombay High Court.
"In this case, considering the various weaknesses in the case of the prosecution, various shortcomings such as non-examination of necessary and appropriate witnesses, the omissions and contradictions in the evidence of the injured witnesses which go to the rootof the matter, definitely a doubt has arisen as to the involvement of the appellant for the offences with which he is charged," Justice Joshi said.
He added that on the basis of "this type of evidence", the appellant cannot be convicted though the apparent perception might be different as appearing in the mind of a common man, Justice Joshi said in his verdict of December 10.
Salman's conviction and five-year jail term was quashed and set aside by the court after which the actor walked away free in the 13-year old case.
He was the prime accused in the accident on early morning of September 28, 2002 in Bandra west when his Toyota Land Cruiser rammed into a bakery, killing a pavement dweller and injuring four others.
"Lastly, in the considered view of this court, the appreciation of the evidence as as done by the trial court in the present matter is not proper and legal as per the settled principles of criminal jurisprudence," Justice A.R. Joshi said in the final judgement running into 305 pages, released and uploaded on the high court website one week after the judgement, and three days before he retires.
"As such, consequently, it must be said that this is not a case in which the prosecution has successfully established its case for all the charges and as such resultantly, the appeal is required to be disposed of," he said.
Additional Sessions Judge D. W. Deshpande, who conducted the trial of Salman, found him guilty on all counts, including the stringent charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
The actor was sentenced to five years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25,000 or an additional six months in jail, which he challenged before the Bombay High Court.
"In this case, considering the various weaknesses in the case of the prosecution, various shortcomings such as non-examination of necessary and appropriate witnesses, the omissions and contradictions in the evidence of the injured witnesses which go to the rootof the matter, definitely a doubt has arisen as to the involvement of the appellant for the offences with which he is charged," Justice Joshi said.
He added that on the basis of "this type of evidence", the appellant cannot be convicted though the apparent perception might be different as appearing in the mind of a common man, Justice Joshi said in his verdict of December 10.
Salman's conviction and five-year jail term was quashed and set aside by the court after which the actor walked away free in the 13-year old case.
He was the prime accused in the accident on early morning of September 28, 2002 in Bandra west when his Toyota Land Cruiser rammed into a bakery, killing a pavement dweller and injuring four others.
1 hour ago
Trump should address Beijing’s ‘ethnic unity law’ during meeting with Chinese President
1 hour ago
'Gyanesh Kumar should turn approver': Rahul Gandhi reiterates demand of CEC's resignation
1 hour ago
Yami Gautam celebrates family legacy of handloom craftsmanship in black Maheshwari saree
1 hour ago
Asian Games: Seema Kumari claims bronze in women’s 10,000m, ends India’s 16-year wait
1 hour ago
‘Agadha’ Brings a World of Mystery, Faith and the Supernatural to ZEE5 on September 25
1 hour ago
US says can help energy security of partners affected by Russia oil tariff law
1 hour ago
US lawmakers call on Trump to press Xi on soybean, beef trade issue
2 hours ago
US Bill to bar China-linked cars gains support
2 hours ago
CARICOM ministers vow Caribbean community's support to India's candidature for UNSC 2028-29 term
3 hours ago
Exercise Yudh Abhyas: US envoy Gor arrives in Rajasthan, says looking forward to seeing troops train side by side
3 hours ago
OpenAI Agent 'Infiltrated' Australian Government Website, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese Says
3 hours ago
Do Popular GLP-1 Drugs Like Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro Cause Permanent Vision Loss? Hundreds of Lawsuits Spark Safety Debate
5 hours ago
Adani Group to invest over Rs 1,00,000 crore in West Bengal by 2035: Gautam Adani
