'TN governor shouldn't blindly invite Sasikala to form government'

 "The framers of the Indian Constitution would have drafted Article 164 mainly to allow a person of calibre and repute to become a minister first and then get elected by the people within six months of assuming the post," the spokesperson, N. Vinoba Bhoopathy, also advocate, said.

"The Governor should also look into the charge of acting Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam who was forced to resign," Bhoopathy said.

He also said a caretaker government is like any other government that has to function through a Chief Minister and his council of ministers.

"Here we have the acting Chief Minister but where is his council of ministers", Bhoopathy asked. 

 Meanwhile, K. Chandru, retired judge of Madras High Court, told IANS that the Governor is bound to call a person who shows the he/she enjoys support of the majority of legislators support to form the government.

"The provision of the Constitution is like a skeleton. The courts, by their interpretation, give it flesh and blood. The spirit of the Constitution is for the courts to decide," Chandru said.

 According to Chandru, a Governor cannot look at other issues like pending cases or where a judgement is imminent while deciding whether a person can be called to form the government.

Chandru also does not accept Panneerselvam's claims that his resignation was a forced one.

 "Soon after his exit from Poes Garden (the residence of late Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa) or the party headquarters on Sunday, Panneerselvam could have gone to the public about his charge," Chandru said.

"Panneerselvam could have complained to the Governor, or the President or Prime Minister about him being forced to resign," Chandru said.